Skip to main content

Tom Petters Conviction and Sentence Upheld by Appeals Court

A federal appeals court Friday upheld the 2009 conviction and 50-year prison sentence of Minnesota businessman Tom Petters, who was found guilty of orchestrating a $3.7 billion Ponzi scheme.

The Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Petters got a fair trial.  A three-judge panel rejected defense claims that the U.S. District Judge Richard Kyle prevented his attorneys from presenting a complete defense by restricting their ability to question a key prosecution witness, Larry Reynolds, a convicted felon and disbarred lawyer who was in the witness protection program, about his links to organized crime.

The panel also said the judge acted properly when he rejected proposed jury instructions that would have highlighted Petters’ claims that he was an unwitting participant in a fraud conceived by others, and that he acted in good faith on advice from his attorney.  It ruled that the judge did not err by denying a change in venue due to the extensive media coverage the case generated. The panel also rejected defense claims of procedural errors in Petters’ sentencing.  A jury found Petters guilty of 20 counts of wire fraud, mail fraud, money laundering and conspiracy. FINRA arbitration is a dispute resolution process offered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to resolve conflicts between investors, brokerage firms, and individual brokers. Unlike traditional court litigation, arbitration is typically faster and less formal. In this process, an impartial arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators listens to both parties’ arguments and evidence before making a binding decision. This method is often chosen for its efficiency and lower costs, making it an attractive option for investors seeking resolution without the complexities of a court trial. The arbitration process is governed by specific rules and procedures, ensuring a fair and equitable hearing. While the decision is final and generally cannot be appealed, parties can still settle the dispute before the arbitration concludes. FINRA arbitration serves as a crucial mechanism in maintaining market integrity and protecting investors’ rights.