Skip to main content

A.G. Edwards Fined By NASD in Annuity Case

Los Angeles Times

A.G. Edwards Inc. was ordered by an NASD arbitration panel to pay a widow $339,974 for failing to properly supervise a broker who made risky investments with her savings in 1999.

The regulatory body, which oversees broker conduct, said arbitrators awarded $142,839 in compensatory damages, $100,000 in punitive damages and $97,135 in legal fees to Delores White of Indio on April 13.

A.G. Edwards approved the broker’s decision to buy a variable annuity for White, now 75, even though she wanted to invest conservatively, her lawyer, said.

Variable annuities typically offer guaranteed lifetime income and a death benefit, with the rate of return tied to mutual fund investments. The broker chose risky funds and White lost money as a result.

An A.G. Edwards spokeswoman said that the firm hadn’t been notified of the decision.

Investment fraud is a serious issue that occurs when an individual or entity deceives investors to gain financial advantage. This type of fraud can take many forms, including Ponzi schemes, insider trading, misrepresentation of information, and unauthorized trading. Victims of investment fraud often suffer significant financial losses, and seeking redress can be challenging due to the complexity of the financial markets and the sophistication of fraudulent schemes.

One avenue for victims of investment fraud to seek justice is through FINRA arbitration. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) oversees the arbitration process, which serves as a faster, more cost-effective alternative to traditional court litigation. In FINRA arbitration, an impartial panel of arbitrators—selected based on their expertise and impartiality—reviews the evidence and testimonies presented by both parties. The panel then renders a binding decision, which can include monetary compensation for the aggrieved party.

FINRA arbitration is particularly valuable in cases of investment fraud because it allows for specialized arbitrators who understand the nuances of the financial industry. This expertise can be crucial in navigating the complex issues often involved in such cases. Additionally, the process is confidential, protecting sensitive information that may arise during the proceedings.

While arbitration does not guarantee a favorable outcome for victims, it provides an important mechanism for resolving disputes. The finality of the arbitrator’s decision offers closure, albeit with limited grounds for appeal. Thus, FINRA arbitration plays a critical role in maintaining market integrity and providing a forum for resolving grievances in the financial sector.