Skip to main content

Free Consultation:

(800) 382-7969

A.G. Edwards fined for poor supervision

Investment News

An NASD arbitration panel found A.G. Edwards & Sons Inc. liable for $258,300 for failure to properly supervise broker Robert Canfield.

In 2004, Stephen Sokol attended an A.G. Edwards seminar, after which Mr. Sokol opened an account with A.G. Edwards and transferred in a number of securities purchased at another brokerage firm including a variable annuity which contained his only death benefit.

When the account was established, Mr. Sokol told St. Louis-based A.G. Edwards that he has a serious heart condition, making him uninsurable.

When Mr. Sokol decided that he wanted to sell some he left the decision on which ones to sell to Mr. Canfield, an Irvine, Calif.-based broker, who liquidated his variable annuity, which eliminated his death benefit.

The annuity had a value of approximately $200,000 and was sold for less than $3,400, Mr.’s Sokol’s attorney said in a statement.

The panel levied $180,000 in compensatory damages and $78,300 for attorneys’ fees and expert witness fees against the Mr. Canfield, the law firm said in a statement.

Investment fraud is a serious issue that occurs when an individual or entity deceives investors to gain financial advantage. This type of fraud can take many forms, including Ponzi schemes, insider trading, misrepresentation of information, and unauthorized trading. Victims of investment fraud often suffer significant financial losses, and seeking redress can be challenging due to the complexity of the financial markets and the sophistication of fraudulent schemes.

One avenue for victims of investment fraud to seek justice is through FINRA arbitration. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) oversees the arbitration process, which serves as a faster, more cost-effective alternative to traditional court litigation. In FINRA arbitration, an impartial panel of arbitrators—selected based on their expertise and impartiality—reviews the evidence and testimonies presented by both parties. The panel then renders a binding decision, which can include monetary compensation for the aggrieved party.

FINRA arbitration is particularly valuable in cases of investment fraud because it allows for specialized arbitrators who understand the nuances of the financial industry. This expertise can be crucial in navigating the complex issues often involved in such cases. Additionally, the process is confidential, protecting sensitive information that may arise during the proceedings.

While arbitration does not guarantee a favorable outcome for victims, it provides an important mechanism for resolving disputes. The finality of the arbitrator’s decision offers closure, albeit with limited grounds for appeal. Thus, FINRA arbitration plays a critical role in maintaining market integrity and providing a forum for resolving grievances in the financial sector.