Vermont Investment Fraud Lawyers & FINRA Attorneys
Written and reviewed by
Ryan Bakhtiari, Partner — Bakhtiari & Harrison
Admitted: CA | NY | TX | DC | Multiple Federal Courts · Super Lawyers · Former PIABA President · Former FINRA NAMC Chairman · Last reviewed: May 2026
Investment fraud lawyers serving Vermont investors
Vermont’s investor market is defined by the concentration of its economic activity in the Burlington metropolitan area and the diversity of the communities that make up the rest of the state. Burlington — Vermont’s largest city and the commercial hub of Chittenden County — has a distinctive economy anchored by the University of Vermont Medical Center, Vermont’s flagship university research operation, and a growing technology sector that has made the Burlington area one of New England’s emerging technology communities. Healthcare professionals, university faculty and administrators, and technology company employees whose retirement savings and equity compensation are managed through national broker-dealer networks represent the core of Burlington’s investor community.
The broader Chittenden County corridor — South Burlington, Williston, Shelburne, and the communities extending toward the Champlain Valley — has attracted a community of relocated professionals from Boston and New York whose transferred investment accounts are targeted at transition points. Vermont’s significant ski resort economy in Stowe, Killington, and the Northeast Kingdom creates an additional investor demographic of hospitality industry executives, resort developers, and the wealthy second-home community whose seasonal presence in Vermont makes them targets for local broker-dealer relationships.
Vermont’s agricultural economy — including dairy farming operations, specialty food producers, and agricultural land investors — creates investment fraud exposure through commodity-linked investment schemes and agricultural land fund misrepresentation. Vermont’s close-knit community structure creates affinity fraud vulnerability through the town-meeting culture, local business networks, and community trust relationships that investment promoters specifically exploit. The state’s large population of small business owners whose accumulated business equity is being converted to investment assets at retirement face specific unsuitable product recommendations in a market with limited local investment alternatives.
Investment fraud and misconduct claims we handle
- Unsuitable investment recommendations: recommendations inconsistent with the investor’s risk tolerance, financial situation, or objectives violate FINRA Rule 2111 and Regulation Best Interest.
- Broker fraud and misrepresentation: material misstatements and omissions in connection with investment recommendations are actionable under federal securities law and FINRA rules.
- Unauthorized trading: executing transactions without prior client authorization violates the account agreement and FINRA rules.
- Churning and excessive trading: excessive trading to generate commissions at the investor’s expense is a suitability violation.
- Overconcentration: failing to maintain adequate diversification in a single security, sector, or product.
- Variable annuity and product fraud: unsuitable recommendations of variable annuities, non-traded REITs, structured notes, leveraged ETFs, and private placements.
- Elder financial fraud: exploitation of elderly investors subject to enhanced liability under state and federal statutes.
- Failure to supervise: brokerage firms bear independent liability under FINRA Rule 3110 when supervisory failures allow broker misconduct to cause investor harm.
Suitability under Vermont Securities Law
A violation occurs when a broker or adviser recommends unsuitable investments, failing to consider the client’s unique circumstances. Such actions can lead to significant financial losses for the client and potential legal liability for the adviser. The Vermont suitability requirement is integral to protecting investors from inappropriate and potentially harmful investment strategies.
Vermont requires investment advisers to act in the best interests of their clients. Under Vermont Uniform Securities Act (9 V.S.A. § 5103), advisers must not mislead or deceive clients regarding investment suitability. Ensuring recommendations align with clients’ financial goals and risk tolerance is critical.
Unauthorized Trading under Vermont Securities Law
Vermont Uniform Securities Act (9 V.S.A. § 5102) also prohibits unauthorized trading. Brokers must secure client consent before executing any trades. Violations can result in criminal penalties, fines, and the potential loss of licensure.
Misrepresentations Under Vermont Securities Law
Similarly, under the Vermont Uniform Securities Act (9 V.S.A. § 5102), it is unlawful for any person to misrepresent or omit material facts in connection with the sale of securities. This includes false statements about the value or safety of an investment. Violations can lead to severe penalties, including fines and imprisonment.
Vermont’s Vermont Uniform Securities Act (9 V.S.A. § 5102) also mandates full disclosure of all material information to investors. Failure to disclose can result in criminal and civil penalties, aiming to protect investors from fraud and deception.
Unfair Business Advantage under Vermont Securities Laws
In Vermont, similar protections are provided under the Vermont Consumer Protection Act (9 V.S.A. § 5306), which prohibits deceptive acts and practices in the conduct of business, including securities trading. This includes insider trading, market manipulation, and other unfair practices.
Why choose Bakhtiari & Harrison as your Vermont investment fraud lawyers
- $250 million+ recovered. Four decades of results for investors in FINRA arbitration and securities litigation nationwide.
- Former FINRA NAMC Chairman. Ryan Bakhtiari served as Chairman of the FINRA National Arbitration and Mediation Committee from 2013 to 2017.
- Former Morgan Stanley in-house counsel. David Harrison spent years as Morgan Stanley Dean Witter in-house counsel and began his career as a Series 7-licensed representative at Shearson Lehman Brothers.
- Dedicated experience in FINRA arbitration. Selecting counsel with specific FINRA arbitration expertise is the single most important decision an investor claimant makes. Bakhtiari & Harrison’s practice is dedicated to investor-side FINRA arbitration and securities litigation.
- FINRA hearings near you. FINRA arbitration hearings are held at the venue nearest the claimant’s residence.
- Contingency fee representation. No recovery, no fee. Initial consultations are free.
Frequently asked questions — Vermont investment fraud lawyers
What is the deadline to file a FINRA arbitration claim in Vermont?
FINRA Rule 12206 requires arbitration claims to be filed within six years of the events giving rise to the dispute. Vermont state securities law claims under the Vermont Securities Act may have different and potentially shorter limitations periods. Do not delay — contact Bakhtiari & Harrison promptly for a free evaluation.

Does Bakhtiari & Harrison represent investors throughout Vermont — not just Burlington?
Yes. Bakhtiari & Harrison represents investors in Burlington, Montpelier, Rutland, Barre, Brattleboro, St. Johnsbury, Newport, and all Vermont communities. FINRA arbitration hearings are held at the venue nearest the claimant’s residence. Geographic location within Vermont does not affect access to Bakhtiari & Harrison’s representation.
What if the broker who defrauded me is no longer FINRA registered?
The broker’s current registration status does not determine your legal options. The brokerage firm that employed the broker at the time of the misconduct bears independent supervisory liability under FINRA Rule 3110 — regardless of whether the broker is still registered or can be located. The firm remains fully liable for its supervisory failures.
What is the difference between FINRA arbitration and going to court for a Vermont investor?
Most investor claims against broker-dealers go through FINRA arbitration because brokerage account agreements contain mandatory arbitration clauses. FINRA arbitration is faster — typically 12 to 18 months — and less expensive than federal court. Awards are binding and enforceable in federal court. For claims against non-FINRA parties such as unregistered investment promoters, federal or Vermont state court may be the appropriate forum. Bakhtiari & Harrison handles both.
Contact our Vermont investment fraud lawyers — free consultation
Contact Bakhtiari & Harrison for a free, confidential consultation. Our FINRA attorneys evaluate every potential Vermont investor claim at no charge. Contact us today.
Investor cases are handled on a contingency fee basis — no recovery, no fee.
Call: (800) 382-7969 | Contact Us